> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 6:18 AM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [RFC] build result views > > I'm looking for feedback on the two sets of nightly result > pages we currently publish: > > http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/ > > and > > http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/builds > > Specifically, I'm wondering what would people think about > replacing the first page with the second, or something like > it. Do you find yourself using the first page more or do you > prefer the second one, and why?
The first page is useful to see the overall status of the library. I'm using it just for sure that Windows builds are green :) Of cource the second page is more convinient to see what examples or tests are failed and how these fails dependent from the build type. I would like to have the possibility to merge the results of the multiple platforms into the one page, i.e.: - all windows builds (MSVC and ICC); - all MSVC builds; - all ICC/windows builds; - all ICC builds (windows and linux); - all MSVC 8.0 build + all gcc 4.2.0 builds; ... It might be realized as the current page (http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/builds) but with the checkboxes on the each line of the table and button "Next" somewhere on the page. > If neither, how do you > analyze build results and why do you find your system > preferable to what we have? What does your ideal result page > look like? What data should it show and how should it be presented? Farid.
