[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: faridz
Date: Thu Nov 22 04:40:33 2007
New Revision: 597396
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=597396&view=rev
Log:
2007-11-22 Farid Zaripov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* 26.valarray.cassign.cpp (run_test): Corrected condition in
preprocessor directive.
Good catch, thanks!
We should probably bump up _RWSTD_VER on trunk. To what, though?
It might also be a good idea to always set the macro so that it can't
match that of any branch. Any ideas how to do that?
Martin
Modified:
incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/numerics/26.valarray.cassign.cpp
Modified: incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/numerics/26.valarray.cassign.cpp
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/numerics/26.valarray.cassign.cpp?rev=597396&r1=597395&r2=597396&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/numerics/26.valarray.cassign.cpp
(original)
+++ incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/numerics/26.valarray.cassign.cpp Thu
Nov 22 04:40:33 2007
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@
TEST (int);
TEST (double);
-#if 0x04020000 <= _RWSTD_VER
+#if 0x04020000 >= _RWSTD_VER
// test fails to compile with stdcxx 4.2.0 and prior due to
// STDCXX-512: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-512