Frank Wierzbicki wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Michael Foord <[email protected]> > wrote: >> The particular motivation is to make it easier for other implementations to >> reuse the standard library. It was something discussed (with the maintainers >> of some of these implementations) at the Python Language Summit. > Speaking for Jython, it would be very helpful if the stdlib was > considered a separate entity in a more official way than it is now. > Jython already uses the stdlib this way (sort of), we have an > svn:externals entry that just pulls the stdlib down. Today, we > maintain a largish number of the modules with local patches that > replace some modules as part of our build process. It would be nicer > if we could do less patching at build time. BTW - I don't mean that I > expect others to do this work for us, a couple of us have commit > rights to help this along.
Why don't you try to get those changes into the stdlib ? -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Sep 14 2009) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ _______________________________________________ stdlib-sig mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig
