On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:25:19 +0100 Albert Pauw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/11/26-12:24:19 | STAT | 3237 | v1.2.8 | /dev/sdb | Total read > throughput: 827938.1B/s (0.79MB/s), IOPS 25.3/s. > > The patch didn't make a difference, sorry. The performances in the configuration don't matter much, but I just run initiator and target on the same machine: sens:/home/fujita# hdparm -t /dev/sdd /dev/sdd: Timing buffered disk reads: 20 MB in 3.15 seconds = 6.35 MB/sec sens:/home/fujita# hdparm -t /dev/sdd /dev/sdd: Timing buffered disk reads: 376 MB in 3.03 seconds = 124.25 MB/sec sens:/home/fujita# hdparm -t /dev/sdd /dev/sdd: Timing buffered disk reads: 400 MB in 3.08 seconds = 129.85 MB/sec sens:/home/fujita# hdparm -t /dev/sdd /dev/sdd: Timing buffered disk reads: 410 MB in 3.11 seconds = 131.89 MB/sec sens:/home/fujita# hdparm -t /dev/sdd /dev/sdd: Timing buffered disk reads: 410 MB in 3.02 seconds = 135.55 MB/sec Seems that haparm isn't an appropriate tool to meature performance but not bad performances. _______________________________________________ Stgt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/stgt-devel
