On Jan 22, 2008 4:26 AM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, I recommend you to examine iSER stuff more since it has some > parameters unlike SRP, which effects the performance, IIRC. At least, > you could get the iSER performances similar to Pete's.
Documentation about configuring iSER parameters at the initiator side appears to be hard to find. A Google query for (iscsiadm "op update" "v iser" -- http://www.google.com/search?q=iscsiadm+%22op+update%22+%22v+iser%22) gave only one result: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00033.html. I also found an update of this document: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00133.html. Are you referring to parameters like MaxRecvDataSegmentLength, TargetRecvDataSegmentLength, InitiatorRecvDataSegmentLength and MaxOutstandingUnexpectedPDUs as explained in RFC 5046 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5046.txt) ? It would be interesting for me to know which values Pete had configured in his tests, such that I can configure the same values for these parameters. Bart. _______________________________________________ Stgt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/stgt-devel
