On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:58:53 -0500 Pete Wyckoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:04 +0100: > > Anyway - if tgtd can be only killed with KILL signal - isn't it risky to > > do so? For example, something may be still cached, not full transferred? > > Will SCSI stack take care of it properly? > > I too would like a clean shutdown mechanism. For testing and system > scripts. Target should go away cleanly: drop incoming tasks, wait > for pending ops to finish and send responses, drop existing > connections, close 3260, flush logs, exit. It may be somewhat I have no problem about having a better shutdown mechanism though there are tons of high-priority items in my TODO list. > complex to get right. Recently iscsid grew a SIGTERM handler too. > See abd1595d358b1cfe6c059aeea74f6ecdc748f461. In what git tree is this commit? _______________________________________________ Stgt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/stgt-devel
