Yep - One of the issues I raised on the initial patch. Cheers Mark
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Sharpe Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 8:26 AM To: stgt-devel Subject: [Stgt-devel] SSC Fixed block and File Marks ... Hi, Well, it seems easy to provoke false positives with the current approach in the SSC code to tape marks. I ran bacula's btape command to test my Virtual tapes, and this is what I get in the log: tgtd: rdwr_request(75) buf[0]=91tgtd: rdwr_request(75) buf[512]=28tgtd: rdwr_request(93) File Mark Detected at 512, Residue = 32768000 Success^M tgtd: rdwr_request(75) buf[1024]=28tgtd: rdwr_request(93) File Mark Detected at 1024, Residue = 32505856 Success^M Needless to say, those are not file marks ... _______________________________________________ Stgt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/stgt-devel _______________________________________________ Stgt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/stgt-devel
