For metro-to-wcf interop, you can also refer to this whitepaper http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/ff842400.aspx
-----Original Message----- From: Akopov, Sergei (GE Intelligent Platforms) [mailto:sergei.ako...@ge.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 11:30 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Stonehenge I don't understand your question. This functionality doesn't exist, at least, when I tried and asked questions, I was told that it worked at some point but then code was lost, and now it doesn't exist. Do you want me to send you various email threads on this? -----Original Message----- From: Abu Obeida Bakhach [mailto:abu.obe...@microsoft.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 2:20 PM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Stonehenge What is the problem with the current metro demo? -----Original Message----- From: Akopov, Sergei (GE Intelligent Platforms) [mailto:sergei.ako...@ge.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 8:46 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Stonehenge I have to say that it is disappointing that this interoperability project could not provide a sample of interoperability between JAVA METRO stack and the WCF. This is one of the most important use cases that the industry really needs. Sergei Akopov. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 9:36 PM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Retire Stonehenge There has not been a commit to Stonehenge in about 10 months now. The mailing list is pretty much empty except for board report reminders for 4 months. Thus, as mentor, I feel this project is not a sustainable project and should be retired. Are there any objections? Does anyone feel that the above doesn't accurately reflect the situation? Thanks! -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog Talend - http://www.talend.com
