STOP NATO: ¡NO PASARAN! - HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
------------------------- Bush
greets the Dalai Lama
Behind U.S.
support for Tibetan feudalists
By Deirdre Griswold Very few people who seek
an audience with the president of the United States get one. Even heads of
state have to line up to see George W. Bush, who boasts of his short work day. Nevertheless, Bush found
time May 23 for a meeting and photo opportunity with the 14th Dalai Lama of
Tibet. The Dalai Lama hasn't
been in Tibet for over four decades. He left for India in 1959 to become head
of a "government in exile" that represented the former Tibetan feudal
ruling class. The White House dismissed
the date of the meeting with Bush--May 23, which was being celebrated in China
as the 50th anniversary of the day in 1951 when Tibet was declared peacefully
liberated from feudalism and imperialist influence--as a mere
"coincidence." Bush's sit-down with the
Dalai Lama came just two days after Taiwan's president, Chen Shui-bian, had an
unprecedented dinner meeting with about 20 members of the U.S. Congress. To the Chinese people,
these two political acts embracing secessionist elements are further proof that
the Bush administration has embarked on a dangerous anti-China strategy with
serious military implications. Covert
U.S. strategy vs. Tibet has been under
Chinese jurisdiction since the 13th century. Today it is an autonomous republic
within the People's Republic of China. The U.S. government's
official stance, even after the Chinese Communists swept to power in 1949, has
always been to recognize both Taiwan and Tibet as part of China. When Generalissimo Chiang
Kai-shek was overthrown by the Chinese people and fled the mainland to set up a
U.S.-backed dictatorship on the island of Taiwan, Washington continued to
recognize his regime as the government of all China, including Tibet. So how
could it argue later that Taiwan and Tibet weren't part of China? Unofficially and
secretly, however, Washington has fomented the secession of both Taiwan and
Tibet ever since it became obvious that the revolutionary regime in Beijing was
here to stay. As long ago as the 1950s, the Central Intelligence Agency began
training Tibetan mercenaries at Camp Hale in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado
(see Chicago Tribune of Jan. 25, 1997, and Newsweek of Aug. 16, 1999). According to the famous
"Pentagon Papers," the CIA made 700 flights over Tibet in the 1950s.
Dropping mercenaries into the frozen vastness of Tibet didn't work, however. So
in recent years the anti-China forces here have focused on a "Free
Tibet" campaign that has made inroads in the United States with its
well-financed and synchronized promotion of the Dalai Lama as a deeply spiritual
mystic fighting a soulless bureaucracy that oppresses his people. This view takes advantage
of the fact that most people in this country know nothing about Tibet except
that it has pretty mountains. They are easy prey for a slick campaign
romanticizing the "spirituality" of feudal times. The Chinese people,
however, have a much more recent memory of what it was like when all-powerful
landlords ruled the countryside. Life for
the serfs Nine out of 10 Tibetans
were serfs at the time of the Chinese Revolution. They owned no land and had no
personal freedom. Another 5 percent were hereditary household slaves. Their toil was
backbreaking. Education for the common people was unheard of. Conditions were so
backward that the wheel had no function except for saying prayers. Roads didn't
exist. Back in the 1930s the
British, who had been trying for years to add Tibet to their empire in India
and had actually staged several armed incursions, made a present of an
automobile to the Dalai Lama. Since Tibet had no paved roads, the auto had to
be dismantled and carried to Lhasa on draft animals. The nobles, upper-ranking
lamas in monasteries and administrative officials, together made up less than 5
percent of the population. Yet they owned all of Tibet's farmland, pastures,
forests, mountains and rivers as well as most livestock. The current Dalai Lama
became part of this owning class when at the age of 2 he was taken from his
family by the monks to be groomed as a demigod. Before that he was just a
toddler named Lhamo Toinzhub. Serfs were really slaves
belonging to landowners. According to a white paper prepared in 1992 by the
Information Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China
(available online at chineseculture.about.com): "Sometimes they were
traded as payment for debts. According to historical records, in 1943 the
aristocrat Chengmoim Norbu Wanggyai sold 100 serfs to a monk official at
Garzhol Kamsa, in Zhigoin area, at the cost of 60 liang of Tibetan silver
(about four silver dollars) per serf. He also sent 400 serfs to the Gundelin
Monastery as mortgage for a debt of 3,000 pin Tibetan silver (about 10,000
silver dollars). "Serf owners had a
firm grip on the birth, death and marriage of serfs. Male and female serfs not
belonging to the same owner had to pay 'redemption fees' before they could
marry. In some cases, an exchange was made with a man swapped for man and a
woman for woman. In other cases, after a couple wedded, the ownership of both
husband and wife remained unchanged, but their sons would belong to the
husband's owner and their daughters to the wife's owner. Children of serfs were
registered the moment they were born, setting their life-long fate as
serfs." Serfdom, whether in
Europe during the most backward feudal period or in China more recently, was a
ruthless system of exploitation through usury and corvee--unpaid labor that the
landlords assessed on the serfs, like taxes. The Chinese white paper
continues: "Incomplete statistics indicate the existence of more than 200
categories of corvee taxes levied by the Gaxag (Tibetan local government). The
corvee assigned by Gaxag and manorial lords accounted for over 50 percent of
the labor of serf households, and could go as high as 70-80 percent. "According to a survey
conducted before the Democratic Reform, the Darongqang Manor owned by Regent
Dagzhag of the 14th Dalai Lama had a total of 1,445 ke [a ke is about one sixth
of an acre] of land, and 81 able-bodied and semi-able-bodied serfs. They were
assigned a total of 21,260 corvee days for the whole year, the equivalent of an
entire year's labor by 67.3 people. In effect, 83 percent of the serfs had to
do corvee for one full year. "The serfs engaged
in hard labor year in and year out and yet had no guaranteed food or clothing.
Often they had to rely on money borrowed at usury to keep body and soul
together." Class
law Tibetan law divided
people into three classes and nine ranks. Inequality was stipulated in the law.
The codes said: "It is forbidden to
quarrel with a worthy, sage, noble and descendant of the ruler." "Persons of the
lower rank who attack those of the upper rank, and a junior official who
quarrels with a senior official commit a serious crime and so should be
detained." "Anyone who resists
a master's control should be arrested." "A commoner who
offends an official should be arrested." "Anyone who voices
grievances at the palace, behaving disgracefully, should be arrested and
whipped." Any socially conscious
person in the United States knows that while everyone is supposedly subject to
the same law, it is applied differently to rich and poor. But in Tibet the law
itself demanded different punishment for the same crime depending on class and rank. The law concerning the
penalty for murder said, "As people are divided into different classes and
ranks, the value of a life correspondingly differs." The lives of people
of the highest rank of the upper class, such as a prince or leading Living Buddha,
were calculated in gold equal to the weight of the dead body. The lives of
people of the lowest rank of the lower class, such as women, butchers, hunters
and craftsmen, were worth "a straw rope." Servants who injured
their masters would have their hands or feet chopped off; a master who injured
a servant was responsible only for the medical treatment of the wound, with no
other compensation required. A saying among serfs was,
"All a serf can carry away is his own shadow, and all he can leave behind
is his footprints." The Chinese Revolution
eventually ended serfdom in Tibet. Those among the former rulers who resisted
democratic change were then embraced by the CIA--which according to the Chicago
Tribune article gave a special retainer to the Dalai Lama of $180,000 a year
during the 1960s to keep a government in exile in Nepal. Today's budget for this
high-powered anti-China campaign has not yet been revealed. -
END - (Copyright
Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
of this document, but changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. For subscription
info send message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Web: http://www.workers.org) To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |