Greetings,
A couple of points from this article.
Tami Bond pointed out that improved stoves are beneficial to the users and
reduce the negative results of deforestation. This on it's own is enough
proof to continue our work. While others work on those areas which are out
of our control.
And for those of us who are dependant on the burning of mineral coal, it is
a plus all the way to continue with our work.
I have 2 choices. Use electricity to heat my home or burn coal cleanly. The
former burns about 3 times as much coal, and although very convenient, costs
about twice as much, and the difference is going to increase as the
electricity provider increases their tariff at about 30% a year for the
foreseeable future.
John Davies.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Jean Kim Chaix" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 6:59 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [Stoves] Stop throwing stoves at black carbon
A Yale University workshop says improved cookstoves may not be the best
solution to reducing the global warming effect of black carbon.
http://wp.me/pMsAA-CC
--
*J. Kim Chaix*
CEO & Founder
Green Spaces NYC
394 Broadway, 5th fl.
New York, NY 10013
USA
(+1) 917.378.8670
_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_listserv.repp.org
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org
http://info.bioenergylists.org
_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_listserv.repp.org
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org
http://info.bioenergylists.org