On Thursday, February 06, 2014 15:41:54 Philippe Ombredanne wrote: > - whatever the api used, it should be able to print the exact same > format as today pixel per pixel ;) and support ideally only one new > structured format for now. > > - I have no special preference for a format, except that I prefer text > over binary and that this should be a standard well-defined format > with plenty of available support in most languages. Of text formats, > using some CSV-like would still be flat (short of inventing a > non-standard way of nesting data) and would likely be a regression > from the current format; XML is likely too verbose; yaml structure > requires multiple lines; Json is a tad verbose but less so than XML > and a list entry can be packed on a single line. So a json-like format > is likely a good candidate but this is not really super friendly for > piped input processing with common shell tools (though the current > strace output is more or less there for that today).
make it JSON. every language out there can ingest JSON easily. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
