Hi Edson,

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 01:27:24PM -0500, Edson Ticona wrote:
> Hi
> I am refactoring in such a way that functions relaying on specific
> personalities are isolated on its own file. The patch has the concrete
> case of printllval function which relies on different architectures
> types; I removed it from util.c and inserted the adequate version on
> linux/<arch>/autil.c
> The Makefile.am has to be updated so that this works.
> Furthermore, many definitions in the defs.h have to be moved in a similar way.

Sorry, but your patch looks completely pointless.

I don't see what it has to do with multiarch support.
For example, x86_64 supports 3 personalities (x86_64, i386 and x32),
so it may require 3 different implementations, but your scheme does not
allow 3 different implementations to be linked into a single executable.

Are you going to make 25 clones of every personality-specific function?
I suppose there are hundreds of them.

I agree all personality specific code needs to be isolated, but it
certainly shouldn't be cloned for each architecture.

First of all, please have a look at
http://sourceforge.net/p/strace/mailman/strace-devel/thread/20140602214522.GA1140%40altlinux.org/#msg32409961


-- 
ldv

Attachment: pgpgR9dcG3EPc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
Strace-devel mailing list
Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel

Reply via email to