Hi, On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 02:07:40PM +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote: > On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 21:07:52 +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire > <patrickdeping...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> How do you think one of following format? > >> > >> > /bin/busybox() [0x10062c60|0x62c60] > >> > /bin/busybox() [0x10062c60/0x62c60] > >> > /bin/busybox() [0x10062c60:0x62c60] > > > > Yes, I'm fine with such reduced format. Of the three you suggested, I > > find the second version with / most readable. > > Next one is optional request. > Could you transpose relative ip and absolute ip like: > > > /bin/busybox() [0x62c60/0x10062c60] > > A string representation of absolute ip may be logger than tat of relative ip. > I think it is better that shorter one is in front of longer one. > > > Should I already rework with this change or wait for more feedback? > > I have no more comment. > Dmitry, I wonder how do you think.
The last suggestion [0x62c60/0x10062c60] is fine with me. -- ldv
pgpiNP7RfPhrE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
