On 02 Mar 2015 14:31, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 12:42:45AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > - x32 statfs tracing of x86 binaries fails ? > > I'd like to see the log. There are two test-suite.log files on x32, > but only tests/test-suite.log is printed.
FAIL: statfs
============
execve("./statfs", ["./statfs"], [/* 44 vars */]) = 0
[ Process PID=476 runs in 32 bit mode. ]
access("/etc/ld.so.preload", R_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
open("/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
statfs64("/proc/self/status", 84, {???}) = 0
+++ exited with 0 +++
statfs.test: failed test: ../strace -efile ./statfs failed to trace
"statfs(64)?" properly
FAIL statfs.test (exit status: 1)
> On s390, besides kernel bug with si_addr, all printed instruction pointers
> have 0x80000000 bit set. If it isn't a kernel bug (and it doesn't look like
> one), then it's a strace bug in not taking some s390 address mapping
> feature into account.
since it's not a regression and no one has complained yet, and we know s390 is
broken in at least one way, i think we just wait for the kernel guys to respond
before we spend more time investigating.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
