Hi, On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 04:28:54PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > > Should other PPC_PTRACE_* constants be added along with these? > > The PPC_PTRACE_*_3264 calls were used when bootstrapping 64bit years > ago, I doubt they are used anywhere these days. > > We could add them for completeness if you want.
I'd rather have them added for completeness if you don't mind. On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:29:09PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 16:28 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > Hi Dmitry, > > > > > Should other PPC_PTRACE_* constants be added along with these? > > > > The PPC_PTRACE_*_3264 calls were used when bootstrapping 64bit years > > ago, I doubt they are used anywhere these days. > > > > We could add them for completeness if you want. > > If we think they're not used then I'd rather you didn't add them. > > That way if we ever get around to deprecating them and eventually remove them, > we'll have one less place to update. Feel free deprecating them, this is not an issue for strace, it won't use these constants unless they are defined. -- ldv
pgpzl_0Triv1Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog! Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools in one place. SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
