On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:49:28AM +0000, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de> wrote: > > On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov > > <evgsyr-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > >> May be you have any ideas regarding possibilities of fixing the > >> environment in order to get nanosleep? > > > > What do you mean with "in order to get nanosleep"? > In order to get nanosleep with usable precision, sorry.
This has nothing to do with nanosleep being not precise on s390. Most probably the hypervisor is simply overcomitted and therefore rarely scheduled the guest that ran the strace test suite. This can happen on any architecture where you run the tests in a virtual machine. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
