On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 01:09:21PM +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jun 2pp017 19:53:00 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 03:07:04PM +0800, JingPiao Chen wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 10:40:09PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > [...] > >> > getfdnlproto (get_fd_nl_family in my edition) is not cheap > >> > (it invokes syscalls), needless calls should be avoided. > >> > >> I have read your code, I will rebase my code after you merge > >> ldv/netlink branch. > > > > The first portion of netlink commits is merged now, > > it's time to rebase. Thanks! > > JingPiao, great work! I have really wanted this. > > Do you have a plan to work on decoding NETLINK_GENERIC?
I think the nearest plan is to decode other netlink families.
> I'm interested in the area. If you don't have a plan,
> I would like to finish the following stub.
Feel free to finish it if you like. :)
> Masatake YAMATO
>
> diff --git a/netlink.c b/netlink.c
> index f9ff465..215807a 100644
> --- a/netlink.c
> +++ b/netlink.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,26 @@ static const struct {
> [NETLINK_XFRM] = { nl_xfrm_types, "XFRM_MSG_???" }
> };
>
> +static struct xlat *build_genl_types_cache(void)
> +{
> + static bool tried_once;
> + if (tried_once)
> + return NULL;
> + tried_once = true;
> +
> + /* STUB: This must be built dynamically. */
> + static struct xlat dummy [] = {
> + {
> + 0x0010, "nlctrl",
> + },
> + {
> + 0x0019, "tcp_metrics",
> + },
> + XLAT_END
> + };
How can you build this dynamically?
--
ldv
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
