The binding error issue dawned on me right after I sent the email.

Dealing with the empty entries isn't a problem in the event handler (just
check for null first), it's more of an issue on resubmission of the form.
Part of the validation is to make sure the images being uploaded aren't
over a specific size. So say 3 urls are entered, and the 2nd one comes back
as too large. The form gets rendered with the error under that url. The
user decides to delete the 2nd url and resubmit the form, but there are
still validation errors elsewhere. Now the form gets rendered with a blank
entry in the url list.

That's what I am trying to avoid. I'm just trying to clean up the user
experience.

Fixing one issue causes the other. I want to have my cake eat it too but
that doesn't look to be possible.

Chris



On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Freddy Daoud <xf2...@fastmail.fm> wrote:

>  Hi Chris,
>
>  I think the reason is, generally, if you submit a form with values and
> there are validation errors, those values are blocked from being bound on
> the action bean (validation is about disallowing invalid values, after
> all). When redisplaying the form and telling the user about the errors, we
> want to repopulate the form with the submitted values, but those are only
> available in the request, not from the action bean.
>
>  Perhaps you could run your list compression only after validation has
> passed (in the event handler)? In the case of errors, the form would be
> re-rendered with the values (and error messages) in the same place as the
> user entered them, but when all URLs are valid, you could then clean up the
> empty slots before saving.
>
>  Hope that helps.
>
>  Cheers,
>  Freddy
>
>  On Fri, Aug 2, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Chris Cheshire wrote:
>
>    I have a form that allows users to enter a series of urls, backed by a
> list of strings in the action bean. As a prevalidation method I am removing
> empty elements :
>
>     @Before(stages={LifecycleStage.CustomValidation})
>     public void removeEmptyImages() {
>         this.log.trace("in removeEmptyImages()");
>         if (this.images != null) {
>             // remove any non existant entries
>             ListIterator<String> iter = this.images.listIterator();
>             while (iter.hasNext()) {
>                 String img = iter.next();
>                 if (img == null) {
>                     iter.remove();
>                 }
>             }
>         }
>     }
>
>
> So if something was entered in element 0, 1 and 3, the list is compressed
> down.
>
> In a @ValidationMethod, the list has validity checks (making sure the urls
> are actually valid etc) performed on it and I don't have to deal with null
> values. However when one of those items has an error and the form is
> rendered again, the validation errors are in the right place (given that
> the list has been compressed), but the form values are not. They are
> rendered (or attempting to be) where they originally were, despite using
> the BFPS. So once elements are removed I get errors rendered by the wrong
> inputs.
>
> I took a dig into the code thinking there is a bug, and I find in BFPS
>
>     @Override
>     public Object getValue(InputTagSupport tag) throws StripesJspException
> {
>         // If the specific tag is in error, grab the values from the
> request
>         if (tag.hasErrors()) {
>             return super.getValue(tag);
>         }
>         else {
>             // Try getting from the ActionBean.  If the bean is present
> and the property
>             // is defined, then the value from the bean takes precedence
> even if it's null
>
>
> My question is why is it reverting to request values if the tag has
> errors? My first reaction to a solution is to write my own subclass,
> copying the code sans the first if block. However, there is probably a good
> reason for the BFPS being coded like this, so maybe my solution will bugger
> something else.
>
> What am I missing here?
>
> Thanks
>
> Chris
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Stripes-users mailing list
Stripes-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users

Reply via email to