Hello Arron, Thursday, January 17, 2002, 7:46:23 AM, you wrote:
AB> Oleg V Alexeev wrote: >>One point to make it one, because of all nested tags are extends tags >>from different taglibs and use its own internal logic, common for all >>nested tags. And another point is a little question about adding of >>"nested logic" to the existing tags against of new taglib creation. >>Can it be done? >> AB> Making it one with the current library?... AB> It "can", but so can the html library. But for many reasons I go against AB> it. One, the simple fact that they're all working off the same basic AB> premise, the same relationships that the html tags work off of. So if AB> it's done for one, it's done for all. If you do for all, it's another AB> property which has to be added to each tag, and is entirely a lot more AB> work with what I definitely feel is a less elegant solution in the end. AB> The clean and efficient markup needed for the nested tags is just... AB> well... sexy! AB> :) Good. So, can you create mirror of existing tags with "nested" features with intention to merge "base" and "nested" tags together? If yes, then we don't need to support two different brunches of tags with similar code. -- Best regards, Oleg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
