DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10979>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10979 DynaActionForm in session losts datas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-07-22 01:03 ------- Myabe, HTML form has elements of all properties of DynaActionForm, this problem does not appear, I think. I'm trying to manage DynaActionForm which has indexed property like this. <form-bean dynamic="true" name="personListForm" type="org.apache.struts.action.DynaActionForm"> <form-property name="personList" type="example.sessionless.Person[]"/> </form-bean> In this way, ((DynaBean) instance).getDynaClass().getName(); becomes 'personListForm'. config.getType() becomes 'org.apache.struts.action.DynaActionForm'. and config.getName() becomes 'personListForm'. So, name of DynaActionFormClass must be compared with 'name' of FormBeanConfig, I think. I have to write another additional comments. Currently, RequestProcessor.processPopulate() method always reset ActionForm. form.reset(mapping, request); But, reset() method of DynaActionForm always reset all properties by initial value, so DynaActionForm can not retain values of session scope. Is this right action? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
