RE: Terminology: modules versus sub-apps

[Craig R. McClanahan]

On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:

> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:22:42 -0700
> From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Terminology: modules versus sub-apps
>
> One other point I neglected to mention, which may actually make the question
> moot at this point:
>
> We use $M to denote the current module in forward URLs. If we choose the
> term sub-apps, we'd have to explain why we use $M as the abbreviation...
>

This was done after Ted started committing docco changes that said
"module" and nobody complained ...

I'm OK with either, but somewhat prefer "modules".

> --
> Martin Cooper

Craig


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>