Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14054] - Rename "Application" components
to "Module"
From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2002-11-04 18:04:41
[Download message RAW]
> +1 on the ModuleConfig interface (Struts needs more of these).
> I'm not sure about StandardModuleConfigImpl though.
> Where will the user see this *Impl class if anywhere?
> If the user never has to write this then I suggest ModuleConfigImpl.
> If they have to write it somewhere then drop the "Impl"
> part and use StandardModuleConfig or StrutsModuleConfig.
'ModuleConfigImpl' would be +1. The 'Impl' was patterened after what we
do here
at my Job and also what commons-logging, commons-pool do for naming
implementations
and interfaces.
If a --user-- is defined as struts-user mailing list, yes they shouldn't
see the Impl classes. Neither, would
most of the Struts internal classes. I didn't want to overdesign but did
want to reserve
the name 'ModuleConfig' for the general concept.
> Dave
-Rob
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
