Well for that matter, is it more Struts or more Axis? Kevin's ideas are that the input into Struts be the same http as it is now, so that part of the code will be more Axis, but the response from Struts back to Axis with the Response should be standardized and generalized as well and that part will be mostly Struts.
I have no objection or stake in it either way so I will start the cvs module at org.apache.struts.axis and we can just refactor if it needs to change down the road. Michael Oliver AppsAsPeers LLC 7391 S. Bullrider Ave. Tucson, AZ 85747 Phone:(520)574-1150 Fax:(520)844-1036 -----Original Message----- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Axis4Struts package names I'm not sure about jakarta naming rules but you probably need an official jakarta subproject to use org.apache.axis4struts. If you're planning on making axis4struts either a contribution to struts or integrate it with struts you should use org.apache.struts.axis. David >From: "Mike Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Axis4Struts package names >Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 10:53:00 -0700 > >What about org.apache.axis4struts ? > >Michael Oliver >AppsAsPeers LLC >7391 S. Bullrider Ave. >Tucson, AZ 85747 >Phone:(520)574-1150 >Fax:(520)844-1036 > > >-----Original Message----- >From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:08 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Axis4Struts package names > >I haven't been following this discussion too closely but I agree with >Mark. >org.apache.struts.axis is the better choice. It's redundant to include >"struts" after org.apache.struts... > >David > > > > > > > >From: "Mark Galbreath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: RE: Axis4Struts package names > >Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:06:58 -0500 > > > >I don't like the package name - too bulky and cheesy. Why not >something > >elegant like org.apache.struts.axis? > > > >Mark > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Mike Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 2:08 PM > > > >Before we start prototyping components for the marriage of Axis to >Struts > >why don't we decide on the package path. > > > >It should be obvious IMHO that it should be related to the package path >for > >Struts but unique. > > > >So I propose a root to the package path at: > > > >org.apache.struts.axis4struts > > > >Then if we decide to extend the ActionServlet it would be > >org.apache.struts.axis4struts.AxisActionServlet > > > >Or if we decide to extend the RequestProcessor it would be > >org.apache.struts.axis4struts.AxisRequestProcessor > > > >Then all the Axis generated component classes could be rooted at > >org.apache.struts.axis4struts without any conflict as well. > > > >Comments, suggestions, please? > > > >Michael Oliver > > > > > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >For additional commands, e-mail: > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >_________________________________________________________________ >Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online >http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
