Craig,
I'm happy as long as things are consistent, and by that I mean across
Jakarta completely, not just Struts. Ant's online docs are for 1.3, but
lots of folks are using the 1.4 beta releases with the documentation being
in the downloaded packages.
Like the other poster, I consult the Struts website for documentation, but
I'm running the latest release build.
Erik
----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: Online Documentation
>
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:37:15 -0700
> > From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Online Documentation
> >
> > Struts documentation gets updated online from the latest codebase,
correct?
>
> On a sporadic basis, but yes.
>
> > I think it would be less confusing if the documentation online was for
the
> > latest release build (like Ant's documentation for example), and
> > documentation for nightly or milestone builds is left in the
downloadable
> > packages rather than being accessible from Struts website.
> >
>
> Hmm ... I may be biased (being a Struts developer), but I would think the
> current approach makes more sense -- the *stable* docs are the ones in a
> release, and the web site can talk about "what's new and cool".
>
> Under any circumstances, it needs to be more clear that what the web site
> has on it -- I've asked Ted to think of presentation-oriented things we
> can do to make that clearer.
>
> > Is that a reasonable request? What do others think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Erik
> >
> >
> >
>
> Craig
>
>
