Thanks Craig, On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 14:19, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > Pretty slick, huh? :-) >
It is slick indeed. The intended focus could just use a little more refining (perhaps in the users manual). If you know what your app needs to ask for, then DynaActionForms are a new and easier way to express it. On the other hand, if your application doesn't know what it's going to be asking for until runtime, then DynaActionForms aren't the complete solution, although they will probably be part of the solution I ultimately build. The two scenarios are pretty different, and the use of the "dyna" keyword could lead over-eager developers like me to assume something that isn't there. Thanks, Bryan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
