On 27 Jun 2002, Arron Bates wrote:

> Date: 27 Jun 2002 14:33:11 +1000
> From: Arron Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2
>
> > > Meanwhile, I've set up a "diff" section in the release notes with
> > > pointers to every thing with 1.1 features or deprecations, that could
> > > then be used to help create the 1.1 doc section.
> > >
> > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/release-notes.html#diff
> > >
> > > AFAIK, the JavaDocs are all updated with @since 1.1's now, and refer to
> > > execute rather than perform, and so forth. The ActionServlet docs may
> > > need to expand on the new flow, but otherwise we seem to be good on the
> > > JavaDoc front. The next thing I was going to do was finish-up on the
> > > release notes, so that everything linked in the diff section is
> > > mentioned above, and maybe trundle through the CVS mail log.
> > >
> >
> > Someplace, we definitely need discussions of dynamic form beans (probably
> > in the building-the-view page) and sub-applications (either an expansion
> > on "configuring the controller" or perhaps a page on advanced topics or
> > some such.
>
> What's your definition of a "dynamic form bean"?...
>

Specifically, DynaActionForm.  There's not a lot that needs to be said,
but AFAIK we don't say anything at all in the docs at this point.

> I have some docco coming on how to make a complex bean with nested lists
> etc and how to make it properly with that new commons collection so that
> the bean isn't fully managed in the constructor and thus allowed to
> reside properly in request scope. People are constantly pushing their
> beans to the session because it's harder to build them with lists et al.
>
> Is this something what you're talking about?...
>
> Making concise docco type stuff for the site, and a tutorial hand-holder
> for my site. Unless Struts site wants more of this kind of stuff too?...
>

I think the basic Struts download needs at least an initial walkthrough on
all of the technologies it provides.  Much a I'd love to be lazy and rely
on the incredible amount of effort others have put into this :-), we can't
just have nothing.

>
> Arron.
>

Craig


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to