I agree with this.
  Furthermore, we can also remove all deprecated/old attributes in this 
1_1 version.
  For backward compatibilities, user should use old version.
  For new projects, user should better use 1_1 version.
  I  will commit the Tiles plugin today, after cactus test suite 
installation ;-). After that I can handle the new DTD and documentation.

   Cedric


Craig R. McClanahan wrote:

>On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, James Holmes wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
>>From: James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Tiles DTD
>>
>>While we're on the subject of DTDs I wanted to propose
>>that we rename the Tiles DTD from tiles-config.dtd to
>>tiles-config_1_1.dtd to be consistent.  Now that Tiles
>>is in the core I think there should be a distinction
>>between versions of the DTDs.  Already the Tiles DTD
>>has more than one *deprecated* elements and/or
>>attributes.
>>
>>Thoughts?
>>
>>    
>>
>
>+1.  We should leave the existing one there, though, for backwards
>compatibility.
>
>  
>
>>-james
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Craig
>
>
>  
>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
>>http://sbc.yahoo.com
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>  
>




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to