DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10191>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10191 Validator Range Checking Bug [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-08-25 05:30 ------- James Farley, We can post a fix to the struts branch, however we will also need to make changes in the commons area. I am submitting a new bug report for commons. An alternative that may be more useful to do RTTI first on the Range objects and check for Byte, Short, Integer, Long, Float, Double in that in that order based on the Max, Min set, I am assuming they are stored as Objects also ? That way if the Range is 1 to 5 Integer and a user inputs 1.3, and error would be detected, but it would still allow range checking of Doubles. What do you think ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] So I requested + public static boolean isInRange(double value, double min, double max) + public static boolean isInRange(short value, short min, short max) to the GenericValidator code in commons. -Rob -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>