There are a very limited number of places that would have to change to fix this. Please let me know if you intend to patch this. If not, I'll do it myself (going to need that working for sub-apps soon).
Thanks :-) Eddie Eddie Bush wrote: > Nasty ... I hadn't dug into the source yet on that issue, but I don't > doubt you are correct. > > All sub-application configurations are stored in application scope and > a reference given to them in the request when appropriate (under the > same key the default-app gets in the application scope, I believe). > The key used ends in "config" for the default sub-app and > "config/module" for each module (module being the actual name of the > module :-) I would think this same strategy should be followed by the > plugins. If a plugin does not follow this strategy, I would consider > it a bug - and file a report in Bugzilla. Of course, if you happen to > have the time to put your heel down firmly on this certain bug, feel > free to do so (and submit a "cvs diff -u" as a patch, please!). > > Bugzilla can be reached at: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla (I > believe) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
