Re: Tiles Refactorings for 1.1 compatability

[Eddie Bush]

Exactly. Though, hopefully, we each will do some things not just because it's a need *we* have. It's only understandable we'd scratch our own itch first, but, provided we have time to implement additional things, I like to think we would do that too. (but remember - we have families we like to see too, and we don't get paid to do this!)

Ted Husted wrote:

10/17/2002 2:28:38 PM, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The "sharing" is the thing we're struggling with - more precisely the

timing of implementing it. It has been suggested this would happen in 1.2, and I think that's acceptable.

Whether and when something happens will always depend on whether someone *makes* it happen.
As individuals, each of us can say that we plan to work on this or that in some timeframe, but I don't think anyone can foresee what feature will appear in what release until there is code on the table.

We can slot the platform requirements for a given code tree (1.2.x vs 2.0.x), but what ends up being implemented will really depends on who has time to do what.
The roadmap is a useful tool, but let's not start thinking of it like some type of requirements document. We all have enough of that at our real jobs. Here, we should be doing what we ~want~ to do, not simply what got put up on the "whiteboard".
-Ted.

--
Eddie Bush




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>