DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526 validator-rules.xml shouldn't have "required" as a depends of all the tests [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-22 18:46 ------- I appiled that patch,I am also [EMAIL PROTECTED], and it didn't resolve this ticket. I will close this ticket when it is fixed. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7351 This is when James applied a patch to allow '0' to be accepted as a valid input. It also had the effect of not allowing blanks. Suggestion: In the future, it would be good to document the expected behaviour in the JavaDoc. If the behaviour changes then the JavaDoc needs to be updated. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
