10/25/2002 10:34:52 AM, David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >It struck me the other day that the validator could be further integrated >into struts. I'm not sure about my ideas so I want to get your thoughts. >Why should people need to subclass ValidatorActionForm instead of ActionForm >to use the validator? What forms have you built that didn't need >validation? > >My idea is that the ValidatorActionForm and ValidatorForm (why are there 2?) >behavior should be included in ActionForm and have those classes removed. I >think this will maintain backward compatibility because if the developer >hasn't defined any validation rules for a form then we could return null >from validate(). > >Further, we could include validator configuration tags in struts-config.xml >instead of using a plugin. This would signify that validator is an integral >piece of struts that most people want to use (which I believe they do). > >This is probably a post 1.1 idea but I thought I'd throw it out here. >What do you think? > >David > > > > > >______________________________________________________________ ___ >Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free! Try MSN. >http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev- [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev- [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
