Would it make sense to keep the current names but deprecate and replace them in a future version (maybe 2.0)?

David






From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Modules vs. Sub-Applications
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:21:40 -0800 (PST)



On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>
> I thought it was application module, therefore the
> current names are still consistent with that.

That's certainly my excuse for thinking we should not change them now :-).
Although I agree with David that ModuleConfig and selectModule() would
have made more sense had we known this was going to be the conclusion.

Craig

> Did I miss
> some threads :(
>
> Wait, stop the printer...
>

Ah, the perils of writing about beta software :-) :-)

> chuck

Craig


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

_________________________________________________________________
Choose an Internet access plan right for you -- try MSN! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to