Hi,
I have a similar problem, in that I would like to use
path mappings, and modules (which are not supported in 1.1).
Is there a clear explanation of the issue with implementing it?
>From Craig's comment below,
> * Someone would have to come up with a strategy that resovles
> the problem of how to define path-mapped URLs that still
> include the module prefix in some reasonable fashion that can
> be parsed.
I understand that there is a problem, but not the *actual* part
which makes it difficult (most likely due my limited understanding
of the insides of struts).
Does anyone have a clear description of the problem, and issues
which make including this difficult? At least then maybe some of
the list readers could think about possible solutions.
Regards,
- Tim
Antoni Reus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 21/11/2002 06:17:44
Please respond to "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Does the /do/* will be supported with modules
Hi, question below
A Dimecres 20 Novembre 2002 00:37, Craig R. McClanahan va escriure:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Emmanuel Boudrant wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:48:44 +0100 (CET)
> > From: Emmanuel Boudrant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Does the /do/* will be supported with modules
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Actually the /do/* path mapped pattern doesn't work fine with modules,
> > does this pattern will work
> >
> > with final release
>
> At the moment, it appears that the restriction that extension mapping
must
> be used for application modules will remain in the final release. Two
> things would be necessary to change this:
>
> * Someone would have to come up with a strategy that resovles
> the problem of how to define path-mapped URLs that still
> include the module prefix in some reasonable fashion that can
> be parsed.
>
Do you mean, for example if the servlet mapping is "/do/*" and an action
path
is "/actionPath", the path "/do/actionPath" should be translated to
"/do/modulePath/actionPath" ?
> * Someone would have to implement this strategy.
>
> > ...And, is it a good advice to use /do/* instead of *.do
>
> For a non-module scenario, this is pretty much a cosmetics issue --
> whichever style creates URLs that you like better is the one you should
> use.
>
> > Thanx,
> > -emmanuel
>
> Craig
Salut!
-- Antoni Reus
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
