It's not so much a bug as a design flaw. The current approach to prepending the module is under-designed and just jams it in. Though, I keep meaning to check whether the template feature we added later ($M$P) could be used to get around this somehow.
-Ted. 12/17/2002 12:22:39 PM, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is there a bug that I can reference (in my writing) for the limitation >that modules can only be used with extension-mapping (*.do) rather than >path-mapping (/do/*)? > >If this has been fixed, please let me know. > >Matt > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev- [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev- [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
