DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17116>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17116 DispatchAction Introspection problem Summary: DispatchAction Introspection problem Product: Struts Version: Nightly Build Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: Other Component: Standard Actions AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This one is a bit subtle. On line 214 of DispatchAction, a missing name parameter is reassigned a value of "unspecified" in order to force dispatchMethod() to call the predefined unspecified() method, which can be overridden to provide different handling of a missing method name. Unfortunately, by relying on dispatchMethod(), you are also relying on Class.getMethod(), which only returns public methods. This causes the wrong error message to pop up on the browser. I see at least four different ways to fix this, and they are all really easy, I just don't know which one you guys prefer: 1) Make unspecified() public 2) Change line 214 to directly call unspecified() (my preference) 3) Drop line 213-215 altogether, and dispatchMethod will get a null name and directly call unspecified(). 4) Change getMethod() to getDeclaredMethod() so the protected modifier no longer matters. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
