David
From: Christophe Warland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tiles excessive memory usage Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 19:00:14 -0500
Patch is attached. Once again, please note that this is based on Tiles as of
2001-09-10. I would send my sources to the list, but I have only just joined
struts-dev today and I don't know the etiquette in use here with regards to
attachments. FWIW, my modified sources fit in a 17k zip file
(non-uuencoded).
If you are not interested in my patch and prefer to implement it your way, here is my advice: 1. go to ComponentDefinition and ComponentContext and delete the following 'evil' methods public Map getAttributes() public ComponentContext(Map attributes) public void addAll(Map newAttributes) public void addMissing(Map defaultAttributes) 2. then refactor/recompile/refactor the rest of Tiles until you have something usable (pass along and keep track of ComponentDefinition objects as much as you can -- never access the HashMap directly).
Regards,
-- Christophe
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 6:22 PM To: Struts Developers List Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tiles excessive memory usage
Chris,
I'm just now getting to profiling our struts/tiles app and have always had some concern about the efficiency of the tiles. Not that I'm a suspecting type of person but I just didn't have any information and that caused me to wonder.
Regardles when or if this fix gets placed in a release, would you be willing
to offer sufficient code snippets that will give me enough understanding to
implement your fix in my app? I'm now getting deeper into tiles and getting
a good feel for what's going on so this would be a perfect time for me
before we enter client phase. Also, I'd be willing to contribute this
efficiency gain to the project(with your help or ok) if Cedric and the other
powers agree this is something that should be done.
But in the meantime, could you supply me with some more detailed information
and snippets. This could potentially kill my project since performance is
the major hot word amoung manager types these days where I work. You can
reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with details that don't pertain to the
developer's group if you like.
Thanks for posting this!!!!!!!
Chris Willingham ----- Original Message ----- From: Christophe Warland To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 4:47 PM Subject: Tiles excessive memory usage
At my company, we have been recently forced to patch Tiles to solve some
major memory problems where Tiles was eating a lot of memory for no apparent
reasons. We wish to share our findings with you. And we will be happy to
send our code change to Cedric if he wishes so.
Here are some quick numbers about our J2EE runtime after complete bootup (appserver and EAR file are up, deployed and ready to serve HTTP requests): - With original Tiles code: 79 MB of RAM is used - After our custom code change: 28 MB of RAM is used
Note that the Tiles version that we use is an old one (our source zip
shows 09/10/2001). However, a quick analysis of the more recent Tiles source
found in Struts 1.1 RC1 shows that most the code where the defect lies is
still in there. But we haven't actually been able to confirm the problem at
runtime since our app is not compatible with the latest Struts and Tiles
development.
Here are a few excerpt of our internal analysis so that you can understand
the issue.
--
Our application does not actually make use of the Tiles template mechanism
but instead builds on top of Tiles' i18n concept to offer localized Web
pages based on an individual's language, country, personality and channel.
We make extensive use of Tiles Component definitions and inheritance in XML
files, and 667 out of the 668 definitions used by our app inherit from
another one.
With the help of a Java profiler, we showed that 64% of the 79 MB of
memory was used by HashMap entries created by Tiles. This corresponds to
50.5 MB of RAM. After close investigation, it turns out that the very useful
Tiles' component inheritance has been mis-implemented.
Our application has only one definition that doesn't extend another one: the root "pageDefinition", which contains common information such as "pageCopyrightLink" for example. Other Component Definitions that extend "pageDefinition", such as "disbursementCB", do not need to repeat this information. When queried for the "pageCopyrightLink" value, the "disbursementCB" component will delegate the processing to its parent component, in this case "pageDefinition".
Unfortunately, this handy conceptual delegation is actually not implemented in a similar way in the Tiles source code.
In our example, when the "disbursementCB" component is instantiated in memory, the Tiles source code does not pass it a reference to the parent "pageDefiniton" component. Instead, Tiles forces the new "disbursementCB" component to make a deep copy of all values defined in its parent(s). This means that, ultimately, our application ends up with 668 copies of the "pageCopyrightLink" value in memory, instead of one.
After modification of the Tiles source code so that true delegation is actually happening in memory at runtime, new heap allocation statistics showed that the problem with excessive usage of HashMap$Entry has been completely solved. The most in-use object in the JVM is now of the type "[C", a common and normal trend in typical Java applications.
The total amount of memory was also down to 28 MB. This is a pleasant 51 MB gain over the previous result.
--
Finally, without being too demanding, we would appreciate if a patched version of Tiles could be made available for for both the upcoming Struts 1.1 release and the current stabe Strust 1.0.2 one.
Best Regards,
Christophe Warland
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<< patch-tiles-component-delegation.txt >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
