> From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 8:54 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: composable RequestProcessor > > > <snip> > At this point, I think the main goal is to come up with a decent name > for an interface which RequestProcessor could implement > </snip> > > How about "IRequestProcessor"????? > > (Yeh, okay so Im of the "every interface should start with an > 'I' or the > writer should die!" school of thought, as well as the even > more diabolical > school that thinks "absabludylootly everything should be > accessed through an > interface". ;->)
Personally I would prefer the interface itself to have no special tag on its name. It is the job of the implementing classes to give themselves special names. If the interface is going to be what people use most of the time, it should have a nice simple name without warts. My model for this is the Java Collections API. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
