I am trying to prepare patch files for the dynamic style declaration using
the resource bundle.  I am using WinCvs and am having two different problems
with the diff reports it churns out...

1) The first is that it says there are changes to code I haven’t touched.
Example: “cvs diff –u BaseHandlerTag.java”
@@ -881,9 +1019,9 @@
     }

     /**
-     * Searches all scopes for the bean and calls BeanUtils.getProperty()
with the
+     * Searches all scopes for the bean and calls BeanUtils.getProperty()
with the
      * given arguments and converts any exceptions into JspException.
-     *
+     *
      * @param beanName The name of the object to get the property from.
      * @param property The name of the property to get.
      * @return The value of the property.

I can fix most of these by adding –i –w, but the example on the jakarta site
says just a –u is preferred.
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html#Patches

-------------------------------------------------------------

2) The second problem is it picks up the wrong changes, this seems to happen
99% of the time with javadoc function headers.
Example: “cvs diff –u BaseInputTag.java”
@@ -150,26 +145,6 @@
     }

     /**
-     * Return the property name.
-     */
-    public String getProperty() {
-
-        return (this.property);
-
-    }
-
-    /**
-     * Set the property name.
-     *
-     * @param property The new property name
-     */
-    public void setProperty(String property) {
-
-        this.property = property;
-
-    }
-
-    /**
      * Return the number of rows for this field.
      */
     public String getRows() {

If you took out all the code with ‘-‘ it would still be correct.  But its
not the *correct* list of changes that were made.

-------------------------------------------------------------

This all leads to my question of what exactly are done with the diff
reports? If they are just read by developers trying to understand the
proposed changes, I think I would want to tinker a bit to make the report as
accurate as possible to the changes being made. If they are actually used in
a script to actually *make* the changes down the road, I need to not touch
the report.

Thanks for any insight,
Jonathan



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to