DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22600>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22600 Defining inheritance for dynamic action forms in struts-config ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-21 04:08 ------- I like this idea. We could take a leaf out of Tiles' book, where a tile can extend another tile, and perhaps come up with something like this: <form-bean name="baseForm" type="org.apache.struts.action.DynaActionForm"> <form-property name="common1" type="java.lang.String"/> <form-property name="common2" type="java.lang.Integer"/> <form-property name="common3" type="java.lang.String"/> </form-bean> <form-bean name="derivedForm" extends="baseForm"> <form-property name="derived1" type="java.lang.String"/> <form-property name="derived2" type="java.lang.String"/> </form-bean> Here, the second form bean uses the 'extends' attribute to specify a base form definition, instead of using the 'type' attribute to specify the class. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
