Oops...  I wasn't thinking... :)
Yep, I agree it shouldn't be an encoding mechanism.

Pete

"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Peter Alfors wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> >     Is there any plan to update the ResponseUtil.filter() method to
> > handle more (or all) of the HTML special characters?
> > It looks like right now only 4 are being handled.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >     Pete
> >
>
> What other characters are you concerned about?  The purpose of filtering
> was to avoid problems where user data had HTML markup in it, but it wasn't
> designed to be a general purpose encoding mechanism.
>
> Craig
begin:vcard 
n:;
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:<BR><IMG SRC="http://www.irista.com/logo/irista.gif";><BR><BR><FONT Color=#000080><FONT SIZE=2><B>Bringing Vision to Your Supply Chain
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
end:vcard

Reply via email to