Oops... I wasn't thinking... :) Yep, I agree it shouldn't be an encoding mechanism. Pete "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Peter Alfors wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > Is there any plan to update the ResponseUtil.filter() method to > > handle more (or all) of the HTML special characters? > > It looks like right now only 4 are being handled. > > > > Thanks, > > Pete > > > > What other characters are you concerned about? The purpose of filtering > was to avoid problems where user data had HTML markup in it, but it wasn't > designed to be a general purpose encoding mechanism. > > Craig
begin:vcard n:; x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:<BR><IMG SRC="http://www.irista.com/logo/irista.gif"><BR><BR><FONT Color=#000080><FONT SIZE=2><B>Bringing Vision to Your Supply Chain adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 end:vcard

