Personally, I feel WSDL and UDDI complements EJB quite well. You can't implement business logic in WSDL; WSDL is just an interface definition using XML. EJB can't interface to another which is not RMI-based; WSDL and UDDI solves this problem. --- Mark Simms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not to beat a dead horse, but isn't the new SOAP and > XML initiatives along > with UDDI and WSDL specifications going to make EJBs > look a bit less > attractive for certain transactional applications ?? > > BTW: that bye-bye struts article had little > substance; it was an apparent > attempt on the author's part to push his own MVC > architecture. Also, anyone > know why JavaReport allowed him to publish that > trash ? > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
- RE: java report article sa... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: java report article sa... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- RE: java report article says "... Vimal Kansal
- Re: java report article says "bye-... Leland, Rob
- newbie jaskirat
- RE: java report article says "bye-... Ritter, Steve
- RE: java report article says "bye-... Ritter, Steve
- RE: java report article says "bye-... Jason Chaffee
- RE: java report article says "bye-... Ritter, Steve
- Re: STRUTS and EJB Mark Simms
- RE: java report article says &... Wong Kok Wai
- RE: java report article says "bye-... Hogan, John
- RE: java report article says "... Omar Eduardo Gomez Padilla(EFACT)
- RE: java report article says "... dclasen
- RE: java report article says &... Rick Hightower
- RE: java report article says "... Bill G
- RE: java report article says "bye-... Hogan, John
- RE: java report article says "bye-... Assenza, Chris