Erm... I was not giving an answer, I was aaking a question. I got the
impression that you have already implemented all this..
Sorry if I misunderstood. :|
-----Original Message-----
From: Zille Hassan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 August 2001 15:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: struts and castor
that was not the answer to my queries
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Dewhirst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: struts and castor
> What's the performance like?
>
> Is it better than J2EE?
>
> Does it cluster seamlessly?
>
> Are transactions handled in a simmilar way to J2EE?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zille Hassan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 16 August 2001 15:02
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: struts and castor
>
> I am using struts with castor
>
> Now this is how I go about it
> 1. create the JSP
> 2. Then the XXXForm.java, XXXAction.java for struts
> In the XXXAction.java file I define the Query to be used with the
> Castor and make the castor connection.
> In the XXXAction.java file the forwarding to the URL or success or
> failure is defined.
> 3. Then I have the bean which is being refered to in the Query. Through
this
> bean data is being read and inserted into the datbase.
> 4. Mapping of the bean's attribute.
>
> No if I want to incorporate any business logic in any bean, which one
should
> it be, should i create a seperate bean or should i use the bean on Number
3.
>
>
> Any help would be appreciated more than ever
>
>
> =**********************************************************
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination or copying of this communication and its attachments
is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this communication and its attachments in error,
please return the original message and attachments to the sender using the
reply facility on e-mail.
>
> Internet communications are not secure and therefore the UCLES Group does
not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views
or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the UCLES Group unless otherwise specifically stated.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses although this does not
guarantee that this email is virus free.
>
> **********************************************************=
>
