I started upgrading the example to use some JSP tags
(logic:messagesPresent & html:messages) in the Struts
nightly build, but if you take out those references it
should probably work.  

David

--- Sandeep Takhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks for the reply,
> 
> I just tried the 9/25/2001 release and used the
> validator.war file as a starting point.  All I did
> after that was delete the struts.jar and replace
> with
> struts1-0.jar.  This does not work.  Maybe I am
> doing
> something wrong?  The error is about ActionMessages
> which is in the nightly build but not the struts1-0
> release.
> 
> - sandeep
> --- David Winterfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > 
> > --- Sandeep Takhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > Outside of what is defined as differences in the
> > > revisions.html file -- what are the backwards
> > > compatibility issues.  This is really an effort
> to
> > > understand what will be required when Struts1-1
> > goes
> > > final and what changes will be required.
> > I don't know when Struts 1.1 will go final so it
> is
> > hard to say what features will be added between
> now
> > and then.
> > 
> > > 
> > > so...
> > > 
> > > What are the backwards compatibility issues
> > between
> > > the nightly builds of the validator and the
> > 7/2/2001
> > > build for struts1-0?
> > The revision notes cover most things.  I'm aware
> of
> > at
> > least one person running a nightly build release
> of
> > the Validator with Struts 1.0.  The commons
> packages
> > (beans, collections, digester) are being used so
> > they
> > would need to be added.  Otherwise a nightly build
> > of
> > the Validator should work OK with Struts 1.0, but
> I
> > haven't tested this.
> > 
> > > 
> > > From a glance at the sample applications there
> > seems
> > > to be a javascript difference.  In the 7/2/2001
> > > version the javascript requires a certain
> variable
> > > to
> > > be set "bCancel", whereas the latest build
> allows
> > > you
> > > to code this, but a simple function is
> necessary:
> > This shouldn't be required.  You don't need to add
> > this javascript.  It just gives you a way to turn
> > off
> > the javascript validations for the cancel button
> (or
> > any other button you don't want validation run
> on).
> > 
> > > 
> > > <script language="javascript">
> > > <!--
> > > function submitForm(form) {
> > >   if (form.validate.value == "0") {
> > >     return true;
> > >   }
> > >   if (validateSimpleForm(form)) {
> > >     form.submit.value=" ..."; 
> > >     return true;
> > >   } 
> > >   else return false;
> > > };
> > > // -->
> > > </script>
> > > 
> > > What are the new validators that have been
> added? 
> > > Can
> > > these be used in the strut1-0 compliant version
> or
> > > will it not work?  What javascript additional
> > > functionality has been added for the old
> > validators
> > > as
> > > well?  Basically what is a list of all changes
> to
> > > the
> > > validation.xml validators and which of these can
> I
> > > copy and paste into the struts1-0 compliant
> > version?
> > The revision list covers most changes.  The new
> min
> > and max length validators could be cut and paste
> > into
> > the 7/2/2001 release.  I'm thinking about making a
> > few
> > updates (min/max and any bug fixes) to the
> 7/2/2001
> > release and making it a version 1.0 release.
> > 
> > > 
> > > When defining a msg parameter does the name
> > > attribute
> > > have to be defined?
> > Yes.
> > 
> > > 
> > > The alternative format for variables i.e.
> > > 
> > > var name="" value=""
> > > 
> > > does not work for struts1-0 compliant version?
> > I don't remember if you can still use this format
> or
> > not, but you should really use the nested element
> > structure.  This was changed so you could use
> cdata
> > tags around a regular expression and not have to
> > escape anything out.
> > 
> > David
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > - sandeep
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
> > > http://personals.yahoo.com
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
> > http://personals.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
> http://personals.yahoo.com


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com

Reply via email to