My property was "dailyNom".  But maybe we should start compiling a list of
properties that do not work.  

Anyone else have a property name that caused problems?

John Collard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:38 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: FW: Nesting Beans/Iterators/... GOT IT!


Was the name of the property "service" by any chance? I encountered that
also on a Solaris machine (it worked on windows), and if it is the same
name in your case, maybe we should investigate this further.

tomK


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Collard, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: woensdag 16 januari 2002 22:27
> To: 'Arron Bates'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: FW: Nesting Beans/Iterators/... GOT IT!
> 
> 
> Thanks for all the help!  The problem (for some reason) was 
> the name of my
> property!  I simply created another property and its getter 
> that returned
> the value of the first property.  
> 
> John Collard
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arron Bates 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:15 PM
> To: Collard, John
> Subject: Re: FW: Nesting Beans/Iterators/Logic tags & whatever else...
> 
> 
>   John,
> 
> I went through the beans and everything certainly seems to be 
> in order. 
> All the names are correct, and there's nothing wrong with the markup.
> 
> Attached is a war where I took the beans and took out all the 
> code which 
> depended on your systems, and put in constructors so they 
> could be made 
> by simple constructor. Then went through the JSP page and 
> commented out 
> all the things that I didn't have (resource files etc) which don't 
> affect anything anyways, and ran your own markup.
> 
> And it loads fine. So I'm thinking that there's a sneaky bug 
> either in 
> the way the beans are constructed (but you say they're used as-is 
> someplace else, so there goes that), or the action or something.
> 
> Without knowing the exact error, it's hard to say. But the above has 
> proven that it's not the bean definitions or your markup of 
> the nested tags.
> 
> Sorry that the problem's not immediately solvable.
> 
> 
> Arron.
> 
> 
> Collard, John wrote:
> 
> >From: Collard, John 
> >Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:36 AM
> >To: 'mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> >Subject: RE: Nesting Beans/Iterators/Logic tags & whatever else...
> >
> >
> >Arron,
> >     Thanks for offering to look at the issues I am having.  
> >
> >First, the basics: we are developing under Struts 1.0 using 
> Tomcat 4.01 as
> >our application server.  This will be cross tested and then 
> deployed to
> >WebLogic 6.1 for production.  Our product is used in the Natural Gas
> >distribution industry.
> >
> >
> >The offending process is a report that can be viewed or 
> downloaded by the
> >user.  The report presents the user with their daily natural 
> gas purchases
> >for the month.  The pipeline, Customer (Their customer), 
> where delivered,
> >and the daily volume (31 columns) and daily contract (under 
> the volume in
> >the table).  
> >
> >I created three beans.  (NomsMonlthlyRpt) The fir
> >st bean stores the
> >pipeline, customer, delivery information, and an ArrayList 
> for the daily
> >volume and contract information.  (NomsDailyRpt) The second 
> bean stores the
> >date, volume, & contract.  (NomsDailyRptForm) My Struts form 
> bean holds an
> >ArrayList object pointing the the first bean above.
> >
> >The download uses all the same processes as the view. 
> Instead of calling a
> >JSP, it creates an output stream to a CSV file.  The download works,
> showing
> >that the data is being compiled properly and the beans are working.  
> >
> >
> >Unfortunately, I am unable to supply a working jar due to database
> >connections and data related issues.  Here is the code, though.  
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Thank-you,
> >
> >
> >John Collard
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:54 AM
> >To: Struts Users Mailing List
> >Subject: RE: Nesting Beans/Iterators/Logic tags & whatever else...
> >
> >
> >After 25 hours, you're entitled to send more information for 
> us to try
> >to give help on ;-)
> >Full stacktrace, jsp and relevant java code...
> >
> >I suppose the other taglibs do work?
> >
> >tomK
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Collard, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> >>Sent: maandag 14 januari 2002 20:46
> >>To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> >>Subject: RE: Nesting Beans/Iterators/Logic tags & whatever else...
> >>
> >>
> >>Spent about 25 hours attempting to get it to work.  Kept 
> >>getting the "no
> >>getter method found" error, even though I must have compared 
> >>my code to the
> >>examples 60-70 times. Sorry.
> >>
> >>
> >>>John Collard
> >>>Senior Systems Analyst
> >>>UtiliCorp United Information Technology
> >>>7101 Mercy Road, Suite 400
> >>>Omaha, NE  68106
> >>>voice: 402-926-5236
> >>>fax:     402-996-9736 
> >>>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:23 AM
> >>To: Struts Users Mailing List
> >>Subject: RE: Nesting Beans/Iterators/Logic tags & whatever else...
> >>
> >>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: Arron Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> >>>Sent: vrijdag 11 januari 2002 3:01
> >>>To: Struts Users Mailing List
> >>>Subject: Nesting Beans/Iterators/Logic tags & whatever else...
> >>>
> >>[...]
> >>
> >>>If you have used the extension and found it useful, can you 
> >>>please reply 
> >>>to this mail to show others that people are using it, and 
> >>>
> >>that it is 
> >>
> >>>worth using 
> >>>
> >>[...]
> >>
> >>You know I use it, and you know I love it :-)
> >>
> >>tomK
> >>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>For additional commands, e-mail:
> >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> >><mailto:struts-user-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>For 
> >>additional commands, 
> >>e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >For additional commands, e-mail:
> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:struts-user-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For 
> additional commands, 
> e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to