Subject: Re: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> === Poolman is very popular. Don't worry. Vic
Niall Pemberton wrote: > I haven't used poolman, but isn't the problem with it that it is no longer > being developed? > > Niall > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: hemant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: 01 April 2002 23:12 >>To: struts >>Subject: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman >> >> >>I currently use poolman in my webapp. I was wondering if anyone >>got a chance to play with the classes in commons-dbcp.jar. >> >>How different are these from poolman?. I still dont think that >>Struts classes provide features such as resultset cache, periodic >>update of the cache with new data, query cache, Pool Management etc. >> >>Regards >>hemant >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
