Thanks for the suggestion - and it's a good one that everyone should heed if
they have heavy-weight JSPs.  But ours are very light, and we have ANT
precompile them on every deploy.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:36 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: New Site


I would also check that your JSP's are pre-compiled.  The JSP's are
compiled as servlets wen they are first called after changes.  That can
take some time as well.  We have been getting excellent performance across
a T1 over the Atlantic that goes from Philly to Raleigh to the UK and back
aain.

Jim Berg
Sr. Software Specialist
PSCI
610-270-4158
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 

                    "Pete Carapetyan"

                    <pete@datafundamentals

                    .com>

                                                 To:     "Struts Users
Mailing List"                                       
 

                    10-Apr-2002 08:10            cc:

                    Please respond to            Subject:     Re: New Site

                    "Struts Users Mailing

                    List"

                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

                    pache.org>

 

 




"Galbreath, Mark" wrote:
>
> This is not very encouraging.  At 6:30 AM EST on a T-1 I finally gave up
> when the page had not fully loaded after 3 minutes(!!).  My personal
> experience with Struts (we are committed to it at this point for
VoiceStream
> Global Wireless's new ecommerce sites) is that it slows processing and
page
> deleivery considerably.  Anyone else notice this?

No.

I would look for a bug in your code, not in Struts. Have you run a profiler
on it to see where it is spending it's time?

>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Samm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 8:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: New Site
>
> Just thought i'd another 'Powered By Struts' site to the list -
> www.peoplenews.com.
> Its a showbiz / gossip site which until recently ran on Vignette (yuk) .
> While the content may not be to everyone's taste, it is popular, about
19M
> hits last month. It's been running for 2 days, so may have a couple of
> teething problems, but it does seem to have scaled well.
> --
> Martin Samm
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>







--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to