Thanks a lot, this is very helpful.

Fabien

---------------------------------------------
Fabien Modoux,
Voicemate - http://www.voicemate.com



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:59 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] precompiling jsp with ant (prev 'RE: New Site')
>
>
> In build.xml:
>
> <target name="jsp" depends="web">
>   <java classname = "JSPC"
>         fork = "yes"
>         failonerror = "yes"
>         classpath="${antclasspath}">
>
>   <arg line="-n -v -a ${jrun.app} -s ${jrun.server} -j ${jrun.dir} -w
> ${server.dir}\${jrun.app} ${jsp.dirs}"/>
>
>   </java>
> </target>
>
>
> You have to plug in the utility and arguments for your particularly
> container.
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabien Modoux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OT] precompiling jsp with ant (prev 'RE: New Site')
>
>
> Mark,
>
> Would you mind providing a sample ant code that does the JSP
> precompiling? I am currently doing that through a servlet, but
> using ANT would be much better... I looked on the ANT and
> Tomcat archives but I could not any info on how to do that.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Fabien
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Fabien Modoux,
> Voicemate - http://www.voicemate.com
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:08 AM
> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: New Site
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion - and it's a good one that everyone
> > should heed if
> > they have heavy-weight JSPs.  But ours are very light, and we have ANT
> > precompile them on every deploy.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:36 AM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: New Site
> >
> >
> > I would also check that your JSP's are pre-compiled.  The JSP's are
> > compiled as servlets wen they are first called after changes.  That can
> > take some time as well.  We have been getting excellent
> performance across
> > a T1 over the Atlantic that goes from Philly to Raleigh to the
> UK and back
> > aain.
> >
> > Jim Berg
> > Sr. Software Specialist
> > PSCI
> > 610-270-4158
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                     "Pete Carapetyan"
> >
> >                     <pete@datafundamentals
> >
> >                     .com>
> >
> >                                                  To:     "Struts Users
> > Mailing List"
> >
> >
> >                     10-Apr-2002 08:10            cc:
> >
> >                     Please respond to            Subject:
> Re: New Site
> >
> >                     "Struts Users Mailing
> >
> >                     List"
> >
> >                     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >                     pache.org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Galbreath, Mark" wrote:
> > >
> > > This is not very encouraging.  At 6:30 AM EST on a T-1 I
> finally gave up
> > > when the page had not fully loaded after 3 minutes(!!).  My personal
> > > experience with Struts (we are committed to it at this point for
> > VoiceStream
> > > Global Wireless's new ecommerce sites) is that it slows processing and
> > page
> > > deleivery considerably.  Anyone else notice this?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > I would look for a bug in your code, not in Struts. Have you run
> > a profiler
> > on it to see where it is spending it's time?
> >
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Martin Samm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 8:27 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: New Site
> > >
> > > Just thought i'd another 'Powered By Struts' site to the list -
> > > www.peoplenews.com.
> > > Its a showbiz / gossip site which until recently ran on
> Vignette (yuk) .
> > > While the content may not be to everyone's taste, it is popular, about
> > 19M
> > > hits last month. It's been running for 2 days, so may have a couple of
> > > teething problems, but it does seem to have scaled well.
> > > --
> > > Martin Samm
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to