The tag "is" a Link Tag. I by no means want to create a new tag. If you read
my explanation I state that. The additional attributes are neccessary
though. The reason being is that the functionality is not in the current
Link tag to accomplish this. It has unique requirements that present the
need for an expanded set of Attributes on the Link tag. The idea is to be
able to "include" the action url into the javascript function call at a
specified an index point along with other parameters one might need to send
to the javascript function. The other goal is to be able to prepare these
parameters and place them into a bean.

For example:

If you have a popup window and you want to customize the size of the pop up.
You might prepare some size parameters for the popup window that you want to
be dynamic. With the tag I spun it allows for this to happen. You can
prepare the parameters yo want to pass to the javascript function in the
Action class and place it into a request bean (or whatever scope) and draw
those prepared parameters from the bean into the Link tag which then (of
course) would call the javascript function.

I am not sure what you are getting at, though. Did you read the
documentation that I wrote. It states that the attributes are added
functionality to the Link Tag. :-)

I think I have already done what you are saying. Please, correct me if I am
misunderstanding you. I am using the base functionality of the Link Tag. I
developed a whole new tag because I didn't have a choice. The intent was
always to incorporate the functionality into the Link tag. Maybe to avoid
confusion I need to go ahead and download the nightly and do a patch
submission. rather than a code submission than can be placed back into the
core struts Link tag.

Brandon Goodin
Phase Web and Multimedia
P (406) 862-2245
F (406) 862-0354
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phase.ws


-----Original Message-----
From: Arron Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:45 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Check this out!


Anyone would think that trying to get an opinion on something is an
uphill battle. :)

Instead of creating an entirely new tag, can you take a look at adapting
the current one?...
Reason I say this, is that there's already a tag there, and this tag
will need another name besides "link". "scriptlink" or something. An
extra tag for people to learn.
Because the logic is already there to do the mapping, and the
querystring appending etc etc, I think it would be easier to simply add
an extra parameter called "script" or something that when set to the
name of a JS function, that when present, will wrap the resulting URL in
the java script function. This means that *all* current links could turn
into JavaScript routed links by adding one parameter, and inversely go
back by removing it. Which I think would be quite sweet.

Otherwise, it may turn out to be just a tag with an esoteric use.

Your thoughts?...

Arron.


Phase Web and Multimedia wrote:

>Hey all,
>
>I submitted an enhancement to struts. Read the following and if it sounds
>worth having in struts give me a vote on the developer's list or make some
>noise for some of the gurus to see.
>
>The code is at the following url in zip format:
>
>Here is the info on the tag:
>http://www.phase.ws/linktag/taglib.zip
>
>I don't know if a similar solution has been provided, but, I tweaked the
>Link Tag to support the writing of
>'javascript:[function_name]([param1,param2,param3...])' to the href
>attribute of the final output. Here is a summarization of it's
>functionality:
>
>I added the following attributes:
>
>function - This is the name of the javascript function that will be called;
>
>functionName - This is the name of the bean that will provide parameter
>values from one of it's properties.
>
>functionProperty - This is a property of a bean that will either provide a
>String or an ArrayList to populate the parameters of the function
>
>urlIndex - This allows you to include the url generated by href,forward or
>page to be included at a specific place in the function's parameters.
>
>There is another class that I wrote that does the actual processing and
>preparation of the url. I named it EcmaUtil.  I modeled the computeURL and
>computerParam methods of the RequestUtils class when I built the methods
for
>the EcmaUtil.
>
>The LinkTag class that I wrote extends the BaseHandlerTag under the
>org.apache.struts.taglib.html package of struts jar.
>
>I know the code needs a bit of reworking to fit back in to the struts
>framework. I stripped out the MessageReources for the most part and removed
>some exception handling that will need to be included again.
>
>Anyways, if nobody has done this in the nightly or if it sounds like it
>might be of use. Let me know and I will post the code,the tld and an
example
>of it's usage.
>
>EXAMPLE OF USAGE:
>
>This tag works exactly like the struts html tag with expanded feature
>outlined above:
>
><pwshtml:link forward="listings/detail/popup" function="popUpWin"
>urlIndex="1" paramId="image" paramName="image">
><img src="image.jpg"> some text</pwshtml:link>
>
>This code will produce the follwing html
><a
>href="javascript:popUpWin('/do/listings/detail/popup?image=NWMT203336.jpg')
"
>
>><img src="image.jpg"></a>
>>
>
>Of course some of the elements are arbitrary to the values in your beans.
>But you should be able to traverse the code and get the idea.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>Brandon Goodin
>Phase Web and Multimedia
>P(406)862-2245
>F(406)862-0354
>http://www.phase.ws
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to