Ok, better yet, let me drop it on my server.

Here's the url for those interested.
Stay tuned though, the struts-example is about to get better......trust me.

http://struts-atlanta.open-tools.org/struts-example-jsp-mod.zip


James Mitchell
Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist
Struts-Atlanta, the "Open Minded Developer Network"
http://struts-atlanta.open-tools.org




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Holzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Handling check for logged-inness using a tag?
>
>
> Hi James,
>    I wouldn't mind a copy of that.
>
> Thanks
> Brian
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/04/02 03:17pm >>>
> Well, that's the magic in it.
> You never see the url with WEB-INF.
>
> Since we are using a "forward" and not a "redirect", the control
> thread can
> go anywhere (its not a request from the browser).
>
> This forces the user to interact with your web app by using *ONLY* the
> actions you've defined.
> They can now no longer call a jsp directly (whether it would have given an
> error or not)
>
> I'll send it to you personally.
>
> If anyone else would like a copy, just let me know
>
> James Mitchell
> Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:27 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Handling check for logged-inness using a tag?
> >
> >
> > That would be grand. I'm just having problems visualising a URL to a jsp
> > in WEB-INF.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Adam
> >
> > James Mitchell wrote:
> >
> > >I've modified the struts-example to do this.
> > >
> > >Would you care for a copy of the zip?
> > >
> > >James Mitchell
> > >Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >>Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:00 PM
> > >>To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > >>Subject: Re: Handling check for logged-inness using a tag?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>What does the forward to a jsp that's in the WEB-INF look like?
> > >>
> > >>Adam
> > >>
> > >>James Mitchell wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Assuming that the location of the jsp were decided for you, I
> > would think
> > >>>that you wouldn't want anyone hitting a 'struts-ified' jsp
> > regardless of
> > >>>authentication.  I think these are separate issues.
> > >>>
> > >>>I know with the QA at my last job, they would try just about
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>anything to get
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>a stack trace in the browser.  I think they prided themselves
> > on how many
> > >>>bugs they could log against us.  Almost they acted as if
> they were paid
> > >>>bonus' for logged defects.
> > >>>
> > >>>Personally, I don't like the idea of adding unnecessary tags
> in my jsp,
> > >>>especially if it does functionality that could/should be in
> the action
> > >>>class.  Ultimately, its up to you, that's what makes Struts
> so awesome.
> > >>>
> > >>>James Mitchell
> > >>>Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>-----Original Message-----
> > >>>>From: Rick Reumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >>>>Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 2:43 PM
> > >>>>To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > >>>>Subject: Handling check for logged-inness using a tag?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>If you aren't going to put your JSPs inside the WEB-INF layer, would
> > >>>>it be a good idea to do the check for a user being logged in by a
> > >>>>simple tag at the top of each JSP?  This way at least if
> someone tries
> > >>>>to type in a url to a jsp they would be redirected to log in?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>--
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Rick
> > >>>>
> > >>>>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>--
> > >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > >>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>>For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>--
> > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >
> > >>For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >>
> > >>
> > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >For additional commands, e-mail:
> > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to